60 lines
2.5 KiB
YAML
Executable File
60 lines
2.5 KiB
YAML
Executable File
concepts:
|
|
- id: question-framing
|
|
title: Question Framing
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Start from a question narrow enough to investigate and revise. A good
|
|
study question gives the learner a way to compare evidence rather than
|
|
only gather disconnected facts.
|
|
prerequisites: []
|
|
mastery_signals:
|
|
- State a focused question that can be investigated with tools and sources.
|
|
- Distinguish the main question from broader background curiosity.
|
|
mastery_profile: {}
|
|
- id: observation-vs-interpretation
|
|
title: Observation Versus Interpretation
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Separate what the model, species account, or source actually shows from
|
|
the explanation you currently prefer. This distinction is necessary for
|
|
trustworthy revision.
|
|
prerequisites:
|
|
- question-framing
|
|
mastery_signals:
|
|
- Describe a model or source observation before drawing a conclusion.
|
|
- Mark which parts of an explanation are inference rather than direct observation.
|
|
mastery_profile: {}
|
|
- id: source-comparison
|
|
title: Source Comparison
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Compare sources by relevance, grounding, and limits rather than treating
|
|
all sources as equally strong. The learner should note where a source
|
|
supports, complicates, or fails to resolve a claim.
|
|
prerequisites:
|
|
- observation-vs-interpretation
|
|
mastery_signals:
|
|
- Explain why one source is stronger or weaker for the current question.
|
|
- Identify at least one unresolved conflict or limitation across sources.
|
|
mastery_profile: {}
|
|
- id: bibliography-growth
|
|
title: Bibliography Growth
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Extend a question through linked citations, related species records, and
|
|
literature trails. Bibliography growth should deepen the inquiry rather
|
|
than inflate the reading list without purpose.
|
|
prerequisites:
|
|
- source-comparison
|
|
mastery_signals:
|
|
- Add a useful new source that sharpens or tests the current explanation.
|
|
- Explain how a new citation changes the study path.
|
|
mastery_profile: {}
|
|
- id: revision-under-uncertainty
|
|
title: Revision Under Uncertainty
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Treat revision as a normal part of inquiry. The learner should be able to
|
|
state what changed, why it changed, and what uncertainty still remains.
|
|
prerequisites:
|
|
- bibliography-growth
|
|
mastery_signals:
|
|
- Write a revised explanation after comparing evidence.
|
|
- State one uncertainty or next evidence move instead of pretending closure.
|
|
mastery_profile: {}
|