488 lines
17 KiB
TeX
488 lines
17 KiB
TeX
|
|
|
|
|
|
%Excellent --- this is exactly the right instinct. You're not just
|
|
%publishing a paper --- you're proposing to \emph{reformulate the
|
|
%conceptual taxonomy of AI}, which will draw both \textbf{methodological
|
|
%and political} scrutiny.
|
|
|
|
%Below is a \textbf{multi-stage verification and readiness procedure} you
|
|
%can adopt before public release, whether for arXiv, ACM, or journal
|
|
%submission. It combines academic rigor, reproducibility standards, and
|
|
%domain-specific validation for the ``taxonomy-proposal'' genre.
|
|
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
|
|
\usepackage{longtable}
|
|
\usepackage{amsmath,amsthm,mathtools}
|
|
\usepackage[a4paper,margin=1in]{geometry}
|
|
%\usepackage{times}
|
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
|
\usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath} % unified serif + math fonts
|
|
\usepackage{microtype} % optional quality
|
|
%(If you switch to LuaLaTeX/XeLaTeX later, instead use
|
|
%\usepackage{fontspec}\setmainfont{TeX Gyre Termes}
|
|
|
|
\usepackage{natbib}
|
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
|
\usepackage{enumitem}
|
|
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
|
\usepackage{doi}
|
|
\usepackage{tikz}
|
|
\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,positioning,fit,calc}
|
|
\usepackage{pgfplots}
|
|
\usepgfplotslibrary{polar}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\usepackage{color}
|
|
\colorlet{shadecolor}{orange!15}
|
|
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
|
|
\usepackage{framed}
|
|
|
|
\definecolor{shadecolor}{RGB}{243,243,243}
|
|
|
|
% Shaded block (Pandoc-style)
|
|
\newenvironment{Shaded}{\begin{snugshade}}{\end{snugshade}}
|
|
|
|
% Highlighting as a true verbatim env (no trailing-token issues)
|
|
\DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Highlighting}{Verbatim}{commandchars=\\\{\}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\makeatletter
|
|
\@for\tok:=NormalTok,ExtensionTok,KeywordTok,StringTok,CommentTok,FunctionTok\do{%
|
|
\expandafter\providecommand\csname \tok\endcsname[1]{##1}%
|
|
}
|
|
\makeatother
|
|
|
|
|
|
\newcommand{\Lrn}{\textbf{Lrn}} % Learnon — Parametric learning
|
|
\newcommand{\Evo}{\textbf{Evo}} % Evolon — Population adaptation
|
|
\newcommand{\Sym}{\textbf{Sym}} % Symbion — Symbolic inference
|
|
\newcommand{\Prb}{\textbf{Prb}} % Probion — Probabilistic inference
|
|
\newcommand{\Sch}{\textbf{Sch}} % Scholon — Search & planning
|
|
\newcommand{\Ctl}{\textbf{Ctl}} % Controlon — Control & estimation
|
|
\newcommand{\Swm}{\textbf{Swm}} % Swarmon — Collective/swarm
|
|
\newcommand{\hyb}[1]{\textsc{#1}} % hybrid spec styling (e.g., \hyb{Lrn+Sch})
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Toggles and figure sizes (larger for readability)
|
|
% Toggles and figure sizes (larger for readability)
|
|
\newif\iftwocol
|
|
\twocolfalse
|
|
\newcommand{\figureW}{0.95\textwidth}
|
|
\newcommand{\figureH}{0.62\textwidth}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}\rule{0.5\linewidth}{0.5pt}\end{center}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{structural-and-citation-integrity-checks}{%
|
|
\subsection{🧩 1. Structural and Citation Integrity
|
|
Checks}\label{structural-and-citation-integrity-checks}}
|
|
|
|
\begin{longtable}[]{@{}lll@{}}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.08\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Goal\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[b]{0.67\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Verification Action\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[b]{0.15\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Tool / Method\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\midrule
|
|
\endhead
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.08\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{All citations present}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.67\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Parse \texttt{.aux} or \texttt{.log} for ``Citation undefined''
|
|
warnings.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.15\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\texttt{latexmk\ -bibtex} and
|
|
\texttt{grep\ \textquotesingle{}Citation\textquotesingle{}\ main.log}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.08\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{BibTeX completeness}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.67\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Validate every \texttt{\textbackslash{}cite\{key\}} has a matching
|
|
\texttt{@entry} with fields \texttt{author}, \texttt{title},
|
|
\texttt{year}, \texttt{source}.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.15\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\texttt{bibtool\ -s\ -d\ -r\ check.rsc\ references.bib}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.08\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Citation relevance}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.67\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Manually verify that each cited source supports the statement. This
|
|
includes: (1) standards mentioned in Related Work; (2) foundational
|
|
theoretical citations in mathematical sections; (3) classic AI
|
|
exemplars.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.15\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Reading verification checklist (see below)\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.08\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Self-consistency}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.67\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Check that each reference to a class (\Lrn, \Evo, \ldots) matches the
|
|
definitions and equations in §3--5.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.15\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Full-text search for ``Lrn'', ``Evo'', etc.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.08\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Cross-referencing}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.67\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Confirm all figures/tables/sections compile without ``??''.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.15\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\texttt{latexmk} warnings summary\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.08\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{DOI and URL validation}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.67\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Run a link checker or Python script (e.g., \texttt{requests.head()}) to
|
|
verify DOIs/URLs resolve.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.15\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\texttt{bibtex-tidy\ -\/-check-urls\ references.bib}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{longtable}
|
|
|
|
\emph{Checklist for manual relevance verification} For each citation:
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\def\labelenumi{\arabic{enumi}.}
|
|
%\tightlist
|
|
\item
|
|
Read the cited paragraph and the cited source's abstract.
|
|
\item
|
|
Confirm it is \textbf{supporting evidence}, not merely tangential.
|
|
\item
|
|
If a reference covers multiple claims, annotate page/section numbers
|
|
(e.g., \texttt{\textbackslash{}citep{[}§2{]}\{ISO23053\}}).
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}\rule{0.5\linewidth}{0.5pt}\end{center}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{conceptual-and-taxonomic-soundness-review}{%
|
|
\subsection{🧭 2. Conceptual and Taxonomic Soundness
|
|
Review}\label{conceptual-and-taxonomic-soundness-review}}
|
|
|
|
\begin{longtable}[]{@{}lll@{}}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.14\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Aspect\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[b]{0.58\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Verification Task\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[b]{0.20\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Reviewer Type\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\midrule
|
|
\endhead
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.14\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Completeness of mechanism coverage}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.58\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Verify that every major AI approach (symbolic, probabilistic,
|
|
connectionist, evolutionary, control, swarm, search/planning) maps
|
|
cleanly to exactly one OPT root.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.20\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Independent AI domain experts (1 per subfield)\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.14\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Hybrid expressiveness}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.58\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Test that real systems (e.g., AlphaZero, Neuroevolution, LQR-RL) can be
|
|
expressed without ambiguity.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.20\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Practicing researchers; maybe small hackathon trial\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.14\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Biological correspondence}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.58\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Check that cited biological analogs (plasticity, selection, control,
|
|
etc.) are correctly represented and not overstated.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.20\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Cognitive science / computational neuroscience reviewer\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.14\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Orthogonality of attributes}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.58\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Validate that secondary descriptors (Rep, Obj, Time, etc.) are indeed
|
|
orthogonal to mechanism choice.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.20\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Systems or ML pipeline specialists\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.14\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Cross-domain coherence}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.58\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Ensure that terms like ``learning'', ``adaptation'', and ``control'' are
|
|
used consistently across sections.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.20\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Technical editor\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{longtable}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}\rule{0.5\linewidth}{0.5pt}\end{center}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{technical-and-mathematical-verification}{%
|
|
\subsection{🔍 3. Technical and Mathematical
|
|
Verification}\label{technical-and-mathematical-verification}}
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\def\labelenumi{\arabic{enumi}.}
|
|
\item
|
|
\textbf{Equation sanity check}
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
%\tightlist
|
|
\item
|
|
Verify every equation's notation is defined in context.
|
|
\item
|
|
Units and symbols consistent (e.g., (V), (J), (\theta),
|
|
(p(z\textbar x))).
|
|
\item
|
|
Biological analogs correctly mapped to canonical forms (e.g., Hebb's
|
|
rule → Oja normalization).
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\item
|
|
\textbf{Graphical inspection}
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
%\tightlist
|
|
\item
|
|
TikZ/PGF figures render cleanly; legends match table abbreviations.
|
|
\item
|
|
Radar plot axes correspond to the six orthogonal attributes
|
|
described.
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\item
|
|
\textbf{Reproducible build}
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
%\tightlist
|
|
\item
|
|
\texttt{latexmk\ -pdf} or the Makefile runs without intervention.
|
|
\item
|
|
No proprietary fonts, deprecated packages, or local includes.
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}\rule{0.5\linewidth}{0.5pt}\end{center}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{terminological-and-semantic-validation}{%
|
|
\subsection{🧱 4. Terminological and Semantic
|
|
Validation}\label{terminological-and-semantic-validation}}
|
|
|
|
Because this paper introduces new terms (Lernon, Evolon, etc.), perform:
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\def\labelenumi{\arabic{enumi}.}
|
|
%\tightlist
|
|
|
|
\item
|
|
\textbf{Cross-linguistic sanity check} --- verify none of the coined
|
|
names have misleading or offensive meanings in major languages
|
|
(English, French, German, Japanese, Chinese).
|
|
\item
|
|
\textbf{Search collision audit} --- check that ``Lernon'', ``Evolon'',
|
|
etc. are not registered trademarks, commercial products, or prior AI
|
|
system names.
|
|
\item
|
|
\textbf{Ontology compatibility} --- test mapping to existing
|
|
ontologies (e.g., ISO/IEC 22989 concept hierarchy, Wikidata entries).
|
|
\item
|
|
\textbf{Glossary consistency} --- confirm that the definitions in the
|
|
paper, appendix, and metadata (e.g., JSON schema) match exactly.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}\rule{0.5\linewidth}{0.5pt}\end{center}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{external-critical-review-red-team}{%
|
|
\subsection{🧪 5. External Critical Review (``Red
|
|
Team'')}\label{external-critical-review-red-team}}
|
|
|
|
To pre-empt ``easy takedowns,'' convene a small red-team review:
|
|
|
|
\begin{longtable}[]{@{}ll@{}}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.30\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Reviewer Type\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[b]{0.64\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
What to Challenge\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\midrule
|
|
\endhead
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Symbolic AI veteran}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.64\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
``Does OPT misrepresent classical expert systems?''\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Evolutionary computation expert}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.64\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
``Is \Evo~really separable from \Swm?''\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Control theorist}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.64\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
``Does \Ctl~belong as a distinct root or as applied
|
|
optimization?''\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Probabilistic modeller}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.64\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
``Is \Prb~too coarse --- should inference and generative modelling
|
|
split?''\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.30\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Policy/standards liaison}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.64\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
``Can regulators or ISO easily map this taxonomy onto existing
|
|
frameworks?''\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{longtable}
|
|
|
|
Collect objections and prepare written responses (as supplementary
|
|
material if needed).
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}\rule{0.5\linewidth}{0.5pt}\end{center}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{metadata-and-interoperability-testing}{%
|
|
\subsection{🧩 6. Metadata and Interoperability
|
|
Testing}\label{metadata-and-interoperability-testing}}
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item
|
|
Validate the JSON Schema for OPT-Code with a few sample systems.
|
|
Example validation command:
|
|
|
|
\begin{Shaded}[]
|
|
\begin{Highlighting}
|
|
ajv validate -s opt -schema.json -d samples/*.json
|
|
\end{Highlighting}
|
|
\end{Shaded}
|
|
\item
|
|
Ensure round-trip integrity: parsing a valid OPT string and
|
|
re-rendering it should be idempotent.
|
|
\item
|
|
Confirm metadata examples (e.g., \texttt{OPT=Evo/Lrn+Ctl}) match
|
|
systems described in tables.
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}\rule{0.5\linewidth}{0.5pt}\end{center}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{publication-communication-readiness}{%
|
|
\subsection{🧾 7. Publication \& Communication
|
|
Readiness}\label{publication-communication-readiness}}
|
|
|
|
\begin{longtable}[]{@{}lll@{}}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.16\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Area\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[b]{0.51\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Check\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[b]{0.24\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Why\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\midrule
|
|
\endhead
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.16\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Title and Abstract}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.51\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Emphasize mechanism-based taxonomy, not policy; avoid ``redefining AI''
|
|
hyperbole.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.24\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Avoid overreach criticisms.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.16\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Introduction framing}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.51\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Cite regulatory motivation (EU AI Act, NIST, ISO), but frame OPT as
|
|
complementary.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.24\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Appears cooperative, not adversarial.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.16\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Data availability statement}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.51\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Clarify no datasets, only conceptual and standards synthesis.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.24\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Meets arXiv/ACM policies.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.16\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Reproducibility}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.51\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Provide Makefile and instructions to regenerate all figures from
|
|
TeX.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.24\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Fulfills open science norms.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.16\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
\textbf{Accessibility}\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.51\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Verify large-font, high-contrast figures; ensure color palettes
|
|
differentiate well in grayscale.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage} & \begin{minipage}[t]{0.24\columnwidth}\raggedright
|
|
Required for ACM/IEEE accessibility standards.\strut
|
|
\end{minipage}\tabularnewline
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{longtable}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}\rule{0.5\linewidth}{0.5pt}\end{center}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{pre-submission-peer-simulation}{%
|
|
\subsection{🔬 8. Pre-submission Peer
|
|
Simulation}\label{pre-submission-peer-simulation}}
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item
|
|
Use an \textbf{LLM-based referee simulator} or colleagues to generate
|
|
expected reviewer comments.
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
%\tightlist
|
|
\item
|
|
``Compare to ISO/IEC 23053.''
|
|
\item
|
|
``Explain why control/swarm deserve separate roots.''
|
|
\item
|
|
``Provide examples of OPT adoption in practice.''
|
|
\item
|
|
Prepare point-by-point responses.
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\item
|
|
Draft a short ``Author Response Template'' for actual peer review.
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}\rule{0.5\linewidth}{0.5pt}\end{center}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{final-publication-readiness-checklist-summary}{%
|
|
\subsection{✅ 9. Final ``Publication-Readiness'' Checklist
|
|
(summary)}\label{final-publication-readiness-checklist-summary}}
|
|
|
|
\begin{longtable}[]{@{}ll@{}}
|
|
\toprule
|
|
Category & Status\tabularnewline
|
|
\midrule
|
|
\endhead
|
|
Citations verified (exist + relevant) & ☐\tabularnewline
|
|
All equations defined and correct & ☐\tabularnewline
|
|
Figures render without warning & ☐\tabularnewline
|
|
JSON schema validates OPT strings & ☐\tabularnewline
|
|
Naming checked for collisions & ☐\tabularnewline
|
|
Red-team review completed & ☐\tabularnewline
|
|
Accessibility (font/contrast) & ☐\tabularnewline
|
|
Build reproducibility (Makefile OK) & ☐\tabularnewline
|
|
Cover letter frames contribution as complementary, not adversarial &
|
|
☐\tabularnewline
|
|
\bottomrule
|
|
\end{longtable}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}\rule{0.5\linewidth}{0.5pt}\end{center}
|
|
|
|
If you'd like, I can produce a \textbf{ready-to-run Python script} that
|
|
automatically checks citations (parsing \texttt{.aux} and
|
|
\texttt{.bib}), verifies DOI/URL validity, and outputs a short
|
|
``completeness report'' for your paper. Would you like that next?
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|