34 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
34 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
# Multi-Dimensional Mastery Model
|
|
|
|
## Purpose
|
|
|
|
Didactopus should distinguish among different forms of competence rather than collapsing them into one number.
|
|
|
|
## Dimensions in this revision
|
|
|
|
- **correctness**: routine technical correctness
|
|
- **explanation**: ability to explain clearly and justify reasoning
|
|
- **transfer**: ability to apply knowledge in new contexts
|
|
- **project_execution**: ability to carry work through in an authentic task
|
|
- **critique**: ability to detect flaws and evaluate reasoning
|
|
|
|
## Current rule
|
|
|
|
A concept counts as mastered only if:
|
|
- confidence meets threshold
|
|
- every required dimension present for that concept meets its configured threshold
|
|
|
|
## Consequences
|
|
|
|
A learner can now be:
|
|
- **ready in correctness but weak in transfer**
|
|
- **strong in explanations but weak in project execution**
|
|
- **mastered overall only when all required dimensions are adequate**
|
|
|
|
## Future work
|
|
|
|
- concept-specific dimension requirements
|
|
- different thresholds by domain
|
|
- prerequisite softening based on partial dimension mastery
|
|
- deliberate weak-area practice generation
|