636 B

Raw Blame History

FAQ

Why add semantic QA?

Because a pack can be structurally valid and still be awkward or misleading as a learning domain.

How does this help with the activation-energy problem?

It catches likely high-level issues earlier, so users do not have to discover them only after they have already committed to review or study.

Does semantic QA prove that a pack is good?

No. It is a heuristic curation aid.

What kinds of problems can it flag?

Examples:

duplicate or near-duplicate concepts
over-broad concepts
abrupt stage transitions
weak prerequisite structure
descriptions that are too similar to each other